Refractions in language

It would be rather difficult to get the clue of what has happened, and if I want it or not, I will have to play the psychologist for myself while trying to avoid at the same time the side effects of a somewhat ‘strange’ behavior as appearing to the social surface. There are things you rather have to solve alone, even more so if you are conscious of the fact that there is no one all around who may possibly help. It would be so nice to be allowed to think that there could be help coming from outside, and in a certain way there is, even it is taking the figure of a lawyer and not, as others would think, a psychologist or other torturers of the human soul.

It is not that you can’t say things in your own ‘language’, where they have an explanation and their reasons, it is that this language has become incomprehensible to the environment and you never know what they may be possibly understanding of what you say.

If I see back now, and I think I would still be needing time in order to get the comprehension of the whole situation, I see myself in a world (inner), which is organized in schizoid and psychopathetic language. It is about 2001. That both languages do refer themselves to a rational reality in a certain way, is obvious, but at that time the possible ‘translation’ is not yet determined. On the other hand, what I do determine as rational (preservation of life as such), is not a common definition for the rational, which does touch more the notion of a somehow defined normality. Normal does vary from culture to culture, from nation to nation.

I suppose that the craziest of all hypotheses, the inclusion of technology in the analysis of the flow of information (2001), is the one that drives things to the borders of madness. In fact, considering the situation from 1994 to 2000, it is obvious that the effort is concentrated in the isolation of soul from the influence of technology, so as to keep alive traditional ways of information transmission including symbols, undertones, images, and constructed situations (inheritance of the resistance against Ottoman Empire). The techniques thus given new life have enormous success, leading to the discovery of the responsible of the attack on my house in 1999. Not only. The flow of information does create alterations in psychic dispositions leading to fundamental mistakes of criminals or terrorists (17 N), thus allowing for them to be easily trapped.

How does this ‘system’ get inserted into a net of information transmitted by technology and how does this finally have as result a complete alteration of the coordinates of reality?

The rationalization of this phenomenon is widely lacking. It appears though this way in situation: I walk around the town of Cuenca talking from one to the other and saying that the situation what the organization of justice is concerned in Guayaquil is horribly bad. After a few days or weeks, I walk into an internet café, almost by accident, at a time where I usually don’t go, and where there is a switched on tv. The only news that falls under my attention is the one saying that the ‘general’ fiscal of Quito is naming 14 new fiscals in Guayaquil, who should do their work respecting Constitution, Penal Code and Fiscal Instructions (words Ruilova).

For a normal mind, this is rather a ‘happy coincidence’. I do though know that there is no coincidence at all: the disposition that leads me to the café just at this moment is what I call ‘rationalization of psychopathetic lines’, some kind of mood which leads you somewhere the same way the psychopath is driven to the victim, though exactly the other way round. Seen from my point of view, I would say that it is as if the psychic lines connecting the murder to the victim had been transferred to the machine or frequencies or waves or what ever (studies on the ‘language’ of frequency transmission from 1999 to 2001).

Globally, I could say that this system, whose rationalization is lacking, is the one I’m moving in from 2001 and after, so that it is for me possible to establish links between ‘solutions’ worked out in my ‘laboratory’, and real happenings as transmitted by mass media. How though is one thing linked to the other?

Is there an interconnection between two systems through some kind of ‘logical device’ that does make the one join the other? How does, on the other hand, this strange reality construction interfere with other reality constructions as given? Why does this progressively lead to a kind of outer realization of inner mechanisms that do obviously disturb the normal functioning of social life?

From a psychological point of view, that would consider my normal way of working and reacting, it seems obvious that the fact of being confronted to a phenomenon that does have no explanation, leads to the decision of clearing up the process by reconstructing the happenings in an outer order that does allow to establish the temporal succession and thus the causes.

The fact that disturbs me the most is that it seems as if the ‘lines of death’ were getting confused with the ‘technological information transmission’. I remember some kind of movement of panic in 2002. “Sask, there are very strange things happening. You don’t have the metaphysical body allowing these kinds of interactions. It is disturbing fundamental functions of the nervous system. I have to do something. I have no choice.”

The thing is that even these kinds of thoughts are thought in schizoid to psychopathetic language, so that it is difficult to know, not only what they are actually aiming at, but what they really mean.

Let us say that a nervous system is not what a common human would understand under a nervous system, it is the logic of the functioning of the nervous system as it is explicated in word. What am I then seeing? A logical consequence? A real disturbance? A possibility?

What are the ‘lines of death’ and how can they possibly be linked to the ‘technological information transmission’?

In the theory as developed from 1994 and on, feelings, impulses, impressions can be localized in there interaction with the human mind through bracketed compounds of words or images. Which is to say that a certain feeling is linked to a certain number of words or pictures that appear to fantasy or understanding, and it is possible to specify the impulse or feeling through the compound linked to it, which is not necessarily rational. This way, it is possible to bracket also a compound which is called ‘of influence’, which would be the effect of the presence of some one else on the subjective disposition. If the sum of the impressions bracketed as belonging to ‘z’ are synthesized in principle, the give the so called ‘lines of identity’, which on the other hand do contain ‘general lines’ (tribal, social, etc) and ‘personal lines’. The ‘general lines’ do link someone through a certain number of codes of interaction to members of the same family, tribe, social sphere, working group, political organization, etc. The ‘personal lines’ do specify the situation of the individual inside of the whole depending on general inner or outer criteria.

It is possible then to determine general lines of communication, which are based on the determination of fundamental codes of interaction. In fact, from 1996 and later, communication does not anymore need of outer links. The proofed effect of the information transmission through the synthesized identity codes in silence (on Malamatula, a non speaking tzarakatzan), does allow to establish further lines of communication with deeper historical layers or more distant populations. Thus the tzarakatzan do lead to a synthesis of the ‘Chinese psychic type’ through the alterations observed from a ‘mother soul’ in secondary related tribes going from some kind of tartar to the tzarakatzan, with widest Byzantine influence.

People belonging to the nearest environment as the Karalis are related to Russian origins. Others to Turk (Uzunis) or even French (Dalakoura), German (Raptis) or other populations. Taking into consideration the alterations provoked by the influence of the environment, it is possible to establish the main core of the psychic type and thus direct lines of communication to the populations of origin.

These observations do concern until 1999 rational compounds of organization including law, justice, administration aso. From 1999 and on, the rational compounds are given up in favor of the so called marginal languages in schizoid and psychopathetic structures. These observations do slowly lead to the conviction that there are logics determining as much the causes of death than those of sexual interaction (low lines). It seems as if general organizations which are intelligible would produce energies that do result either in death either in sexual interaction. And it is possible to interact with these energies through the synthesis of identity of the logics producing the energies, which are on the other hand, compounds derivable from the observation of general situations.

Strangely, whole blocks of organizations appear which are linked through the same lines and are commonly said mafia. These lines are though not the psychic lines as considered before. They do leave recurrent signs in mind or on the outer world, which are always the same if corresponding to determined lines. These signs are codes which do configure a language, and the language does tell the ‘projects’. As in the example in psychopathetic language, as it is determined by sexual association: word (as thought) is associated to semen and this to something else, as tooth paste, or other (depending on lines). As an agreement is a sexual interaction, the very fact of brushing his teeth symbolizes an agreement. As the codes are reverted, a sexual interaction is an agreement of killing, while a murder is a romantic proposition. The ‘clouds’ of language thus composed do transmit most of the lines for crimes as committed whether terrorist or financial or other. It composes some kind of ‘international psychic tribe’, with slight differentiations.

Analysis on the ‘Twin tower attack’ do show that the so called ‘lines of aggression’ or logical compound at the origin and thus supporting the attack do come from France with a deviation mechanism towards England. The interaction between the logical compounds and appearance do show that financial and political support is given from upper class French to Al Quaida linked Syrian Arabs.

Analysis on the Spanish ‘11-M’ attack do show much more sophisticated lines of connection between French state related ETA support and accidentally formed Muslim terrorist groups. The deviation system used in 1999 has been now doubled by a deviation of the terrorist group as appearing being at the origin of attack.

It is thus possible to establish direct lines of connection between main mafia activity (Salif) and established political or national groups, or even to follow the attempts of invading territory by one or the other.

How is this though linked to the so called ‘realm of death’ or ‘very low lines’? (Comment: “Sask, you are introducing very low lines into the upper lines, you are going to create such a mess that it will be difficult to find any kind of solution after. Are you hell going to stop dong this?” But, what is going on?)

The language of the psychopath and the ‘ghost’ is exactly the same, with the difference that the psychopath’s language is somehow attached to empirical environment and thus considers factors the ‘ghost’ does not consider. It is not necessary to believe in ghosts in order to understand the functioning of the ‘theory of very low lines’. If you consider that you can establish codes of identity both based on the appearance or behavior and the language of the individual, it is perfectly possible to think that you can get these codes through the reading of a book or through the attentive observation of a very old building. Whether you think that a lower realm exists or not, it is always possible to think that memory does transmit in very condensed synthesized ‘chips’ the historical experience of a people or population, which in my understanding does even materialize itself in proper matter as neurons or other. It is thus thinkable that the codes of identity of bracketed past does interact even physically with a human being.

Indifferently thus whether you consider these ‘clouds’ as ghosts or just ‘synthesized information’ they use the same ‘language’ than the psychopath’s, though without any link to empirical reality except if related by the same codes to some kind of building or other. Example: the theory of the six wings, somehow translated from very deep Chinese ‘chips’, does show itself in the pagodas. The language it appears in, though, is not a psychopath’s language, though this language does allow to establish the relationship between the former and the pagodas.

Apparently there is a link between the ‘very low lines’ theory and the ‘technological transmission of information’. In a certain way, you can consider that most of the ‘historical memory’ is transmitted through tones.

Analysis of tones used by Macedonian populations of the northern Greece or FIROM, do show that these can affect even the body (nausea, headaches, loss of concentration), in what we could say ‘magic’ having possibly even death as consequence. If you separate the words as such, from the tones, and you search for the inner logic determining the meaning of the tones, you discover whole blocks of logics which seem to transmit ‘historical memory’ in different ways.

Are tones anything but waves or frequencies? How different are technological frequencies from tones? How much is it possible to ‘communicate’ with surrounding waves or frequencies? Or put differently, if the human psychic system does absorb masses of psychic information through the analysis, mostly unconscious, of tones, how much does it not absorb also other types of frequencies?

Consider the 5 types as put in universal organization:
First refracted: word considered as conveying meaning in the others understanding (bridge to oligofrenian , Mongolian, schizoid and psychopathetic languages)
Second refracted: word as considered conveying the meaning in the same’s understanding (rational language)
Third refracted: word as refusing to convey the given meaning in tones and interacting with the unconscious through mechanisms of repression
Fourth refracted: word as building a different world in meaning from the one conveyed by tones
Fifth refracted: tones as conveying meaning in a logic of interaction with the psychic reality of another

If you keep yourself in a fifth refracted, appearance is kept though it is a slight façade that does allow deeper interactions mostly in the attempt of blocking effects of a third refracted; which is to say, that most of the interaction is based on tones. Bridges of communication do pass through border line associations in identity, as for example to explain the word ‘tone’ or ‘meaning’ through the more empirical ‘frequency’ or ‘wave’. But a frequency is not a wave. In lower intelligences (second refracted) it is impossible to understand the assimilation from the ‘tone’ to the ‘frequency’, as the one is referred to a phenomenon associated to voice and psychic reality, and the other to technological scientific facts. For him, this association does have as a consequence the fusion between space (the second) and time (the first), and this fusion is exactly the territory where ‘very low level transmission’ does happen, reason why such kind of misbehaviors were punished to death in OT, for example (magic and necromancy).

For a normal human being, it is of need that concepts are ordered in ‘spaces’, so as to maintain the clear separation of time and space, for he gets lost otherwise. Associations that do break the volumes of space and time are dangerous and create deepest confusion, and are though the only way to establish relationships to people using logics in low or very low lines (first refracted).

It can be said, in a certain way, that the progressive negation of the factual realm of soul, does lead to the disappearance of the notion of time in consequence and further to shifts in the general organization of reality, so that it appears as almost necessary to establish links to the low and very low level of reality in order to maintain the existence of psychic reality.

How does though the organization of the logics in low and very low level affect the interaction with outer reality so as to produce situations as the one described above? If the disturbance produced by the confusion of languages (use of fifth refracted in second refracted reality) does allow to have an insight on probable phenomena as observable, it does not explain why there is such a configuration possible involving outer reality. (Observation: “There is a superposition of inner reality on outer reality. The psychic nature is imposing itself on biological reality.” 2002)
Dialogue with Sask: “A frequency is not a tone.” “You just said that a tone was a frequency.” “I said that you can figure out what a tone is if you know what a frequency is.” “What is the difference between the one and the other?” “The one establishes an identity, such as ‘white to snow’, or ‘animal to lion’, or in a real synonym, while the other does revert a logic. In a different logic the impression left by a notion is understood as a different notion in a common logic, and thus in that logic and only there is an identity between the mark left by the use of a word in it’s meaning, the notion, and something else.”

In a certain way it should be possible to think that matter has it’s own logic, too, and thus a determined language. If this is true, than it is possible to understand that someone may be guided by impulses ordering at the same time outer and inner reality (instinct). Further developments of this language in its technological variations may explain situations as the one described above.

Is this so, though, the whole does build up a new tone, which is the result of the condensed mass of thought as implied by the very realization. Is it than the same to ‘make experiences on tones at home’ (third to fifth refracted in music, for example) or to have ‘new’ tones transmitted by the very fact of being under observation? How does the ‘new tone’ react in an ‘illegal’ situation? It does certainly leave strains on memory, and is transmitted in a metaphysical context that does not allow its appearance.

Is it now possible to explain the appearance of a ‘strange phenomenon’ through an empirical realization from 2003 to 2006? What does Hannah’s murder have to do with the disturbance in the apprehension of reality or the obvious social disorder caused by uncommon behavior? It needs further thought, because it is not easy to determine.