Sask falls in love with Natasha in Sos del rey Católico

An attempt to fight against irrationality

We can distinguish three types of statement. A statement referred to empirical reality and the theoretical frame depending. A hypothetical statement and the frame depending. A symbolic or metaphoric statement and the frame depending.
Realms:
Hypothesis // Understanding // Fantasy or Myth (soul)
What is a hypothesis? ‘En pura hipótesis me encuentro.’
Hypothesis is a statement whose validity has not yet been verified. Usually the mind does activate a certain number of mechanisms in order to verify a statement, whether logical or empirical. It does order in memory statements depending on them being verified or not. The mechanisms of verification vary. It can though be said that the usual vector of verification is a notion as transmitted by a certain tone as most of the people can’t follow the process of demonstration or further verify. It is thus not ‘verified’ as such, but ‘reliable in general’, the realm most people do move in.
How does Fantasy differentiate itself from Hypothesis?
Fantasy does shoe two different aspects. Either it is the realm of myth, where extremely complex and abstract situations are represented through human figures or every day situations that do synthesize the whole, showing different modalities: insertion of metaphor in empirical context (AT), representation of complex psychological functions through a simple history (Herodote), symbolization of general rules of human behaviour through mythological figures (Hesiod), or it is the realm of finality, where the consequences of general thought or behaviour is shown through images, pictures, movies, literature, even architecture, sculpture, decoration etc. The first is different from the second, in this that it does refer itself to the very functioning of soul, while the second is a function of mind in its ability to represent in image a certain circumstance.
Hypothesis though is subjected to the logical part of functioning of the understanding. It works through formal mechanisms and has to be submitted to a certain number of admitted processes of verification.
The human activity can be understood in its three aspects of intention, modality of realization and finality. Intention does move itself in the realm of myth. Realization in understanding and finality in fantasy.
Association in couples to functions in human behaviour and national equivalences
Ff = Myth = Greece
fm = understanding = Italy
mm = fantasy = Spain
In a logic as determined from 1995/2003
Hypothesis of existence = Greece
Possibility of understanding = Israel In ‘frozen’ soul = Russia
Insertion of ff in mm = Ecuador

General frame of thought:
The tone conveying ‘reliability’ is dead. In order to recreate the tone in question it is of need to build a device that allows it to be re-established without the possibility existing of it being destroyed again.
Greece is the realm of myth (ff). As no ‘truth’ is attributed to myth, it is generally associated to fantasy in illusion (no determined link to soul): fusion of ff with mm. Thus, a hypothetical ‘state’ is created: it could be that myth has validity in itself.
The hypothetical state is the point of departure, needing though of further verification.
Who is Sask? Sask is a forth refracted, who does convey the contrary to what is said. In Israel, (possibility of understanding), what is said does impose itself on what is meant.
Who is Natasha? Natasha is also a forth refracted, but being in Russia, there is no vertical cut between the said and the meant, but a horizontal superposition in word between the meant and the said, so that it is impossible to know, which realm the word is referred two.
Both belong in hypothesis to the category hr, but in very different modalities.
Sask is a normal ‘f’ who is pushed through circumstances to an ff sphere, in male nature for Russian eyes (through the structures of understanding)
Natasha is a female in ff in a social context that does absorb ff in the ‘Benjamin’ structure. (Benjamin is the man without connection between understanding and soul. Born from Rachels reminders of Laban’s idols, is the cause of her death. It is visible through history that this type, general prototype of some kind of psychopathetic behaviour as described in judges for the tribe of Benjamin, is absorbed by an undetermined couple of ff, getting married to the female, while the male stays free in order to create the necessary erotic tension, see ref ‘Medea’, and other).
Sak and Natasha meet in Sos del Rey Católico.
Sos del Rey Católico is a Spanish Parador. (Kind of hotel). And a game of words:
SOS: signs of highest alarm
SoS: Secret of State
Sos is possibly another old word for hostal, or place to stay.
As we are in Spain, we move in the realm of finality.
As we are in Sos del Rey Católico we move in a wordgame with three possible interpretations based on the ‘tanto monta monta tanto, Isabel como Fernando’ (equality of power of the king and the queen of the Catholic Monarchs.)
How do Sask and Natasha communicate in the realm of finality?
Natasha understands what Sask means and does not hear what she says.
Sask does consider everything Natasha says as empirical facts.
These lines of understanding do build up a current (psychic line of communication) that does separate the ff realm from the mm realm. The evidence of ‘confidence’ is the evidence of meaning, and the evidence of meaning the evidence of a determined language conveying its proper values.
As such, it does not save ff, but at least the symbolic nature of women’s language.
Mm realm gets lost for rational parameters.
If I’m Sask and Natasha in logic, in the given lines of communication, what happens in Ecuador? The given logic does make the mm logic explode. This explosion does shatter the given logic differentiating man from woman with greatest double advantages for mm (social recognition through marriage, freedom through male advantage for ‘adventures’, and largest social development in arts, culture, etc.), and none for ff, by introducing the male and the female in all scales on psychic levels, restoring the differentiation ff and fm, eliminates mm if not in ff, and opens the possibility of reinsertion of ff in active social life (takes literature, arts, general organization and command).
How though does the Natasha/Sask ‘love affair’ in Spain restore the rational tone of reliability?